Speaking about the costs of servers to the run remote desktop protocol we use at work, made me question if you need an actual server to be able to use or if a desktop computer could be an option.
It turns out that a desktop computer can be an option, and it could be a better fit for the needs of the business. The cost of acquisition of a computer that fits our needs is a lot cheaper, and it would be under the direct control of our IT department. The second point is important, since it means that the security of the computer could be done according to the business needs and verified continuously to ensure the integrity of the system internally.
Since the computer could be hosted on premises, it means that securing the network used to connect to it would be easier. It could be set to only accept connections only from authorized devices and limit the privileges of each user. The main risks to the system security for the computer are who can connect to it, and what the users do when they are in the system.
Getting a server would be an over kill, and renting it is too expensive. So, setting a top end desktop is the best option. It gives the best value, and since it could be hosted on premise it would be more secure. it isn't a negligible investment, but is one that make more sense for our needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment