The Missing Link: Why Linux Needs a Human Touch to Go Mainstream

As a Linux Mint user for five years, and used Ubuntu for other about eight years before, I have seen Linux getting better and more user friendly with time. While there are some distros like Arch, that require more technical know-how, there are distros like Linux Mint and Zorin OS that are great for people who are new to Linux, or just want an OS that doesn't need to get their hands into the technical side of managing their computer.

Yet, it is hard to make people that haven't used Linux Mint, or other distro like it, to see that it is quite an easy OS by anyone no mater how much technical knowledge they have. While there is some learning curve when jumping to from Windows, it isn't as big as many think. Because basically the mayor changes are some of the names of the apps that used to administrate the OS use. Installing apps, are least the most commonly used, can be used via the software manager which uses a graphical interface for the install, and uninstall, process.

Even if there is a need to use the terminal, there are easy to use guides to help out. But,those cases are becoming less common, since Linux distros that focus on being user friendly are working on making apps available on their software managers to be installed easy via a graphic interface. Which is important, because people coming from Windows to Linux are used doing so.

I feel what is also missing from more adoption, is making new users welcomed. Specially those who aren't technically savvy.  Without them, the adoption of Linux will be minimal since those are the most the of the user base. There is a need to create a way that makes the jump easier, by making them feel welcome and helping them along.

How do we help them? By pointing them to the tools they need to solve the problems that come up, and actually help them step-by-step when they need that help. Not everyone was the same level of knowledge, or has the time or want, to get that knowledge. 

By making it easy not only to make the jump, but to stay, the current user will benefit from having more people using a Linux distro. Because with more users, Linux will become a OS that more apps developers will target. Not only corporate, but also independent developers, since there will be people to support their apps. By creating a bigger market, and ecosystem, for users for apps on Linux the more will it become an option for more people.

I would also want to see physical places set up to help people out when they face a problem.. While online tools are available, and there are great, they still don't create the level of trust that having a person beside you helping, and teaching you, best practices and how to make the most out of your computer. From how to use certain apps the best ways, to how to create hem, there is lot of ways these places can help making Linux a trusted OS for more people. With this, more manufactures will have more motives to sell their computers with Linux preinstall. Maybe not all of them, but at least the more popular ones. Some might sell computers with no OS, allowing users install their own when they buy it. Another way physical places can help out people who choose to go that way.

At the end of the day, computers and software are tools used by people to do something. Either it is for work, or for leisure, the tool they choose has to work for them without getting in the way, or having to learn how to do everything to use it. Some just want to get the apps they need ready to be used, and the OS they run on doesn't get in the way.  Linux can be that, and still have a place for those who like to build their OS and computer from the ground up.

That is the power of Linux, it has the power to be the tool any user needs and can use. 

The OS-Agnostic Revolution: How Web Apps Make Switching Easy

With web apps becoming more common as time goes on, it makes ditching proprietary software possible for more people. Mainly because web apps just require a web browser to make use of them, making it easy not having to install the app itself on your computer to use it.

Since web standards are open, it means that people can access their any web app from their preferred web browser from any computer. Not only that, since most modern operating systems have a way to treat web apps as native apps, users should not notice any difference between them. You click on the icon on the desktop, or start menu, and the app opens as any other app.

This is extremely important for web apps becoming more widely used, and adopted by software developers, because it take most of the friction out of its use.

The downside of web apps having to have the computer to be online to be used is becoming less relevant, since data can be stored locally and synced once an Internet connection is made. This makes its just as useful as native apps, since they don't need to hace Internet access to be used, with the added benefit that the data the web app uses can be synced with several computers, or other devices, the user chooses to sync with.

Most importantly, web apps are OS agnostic. This mean, quite importantly, that web apps can be accessed via any web browser independent of which OS is used to run said browser. All that is needed is that the browser supports web standards, which most modern web browsers do. Which will push developers to implement open standards to target as many people as possible.

Another benefit of web apps, is that it could help making developers used to develop cross platform apps because they become used to develop with open standards. Which could mean that more native apps could be developed in a way that they could run on more operating systems without much problem. While this won't mean more people making the jump to Linux, or macOS, from Windows, it will make the jump much easier for those who choose to make it.

This benefits user, since it would make Microsoft to actually compete with Apple, and Linux distros, to keep users from jumping.

Web apps might be what open source software needs to become more widely use, by making users less dependent on native apps and by helping developers to become more confortable using open standards and developing cross platform apps. Also to help develop the tools, and estandarizase them, so cross platform software development becomes the norm.

Time will tell if this is the future we are looking for, but I'm quite hopeful it will be. 

The Open-Source "Genius Bar"

Since a couple of months ago, I've started to ask myself how to start an organization focused to educating and helping people to move to using open-source software. It is not enough talking, and giving examples, of open-source software with which proprietary software can be replaced with, it is just as important to teach people how to use it.

For example, you can convince people to make the jump to LibreOffice from Microsoft Office. Yet, since they don't work exactly the same, without help during the transition people will grow frustrated and move back. What makes things worse, is that they might go back believing that LibreOffice is bad, when it is a real alternative to Microsoft Office.

The same goes for every other app, and operating system, without proper support to help people make the best of them the transition will not happen. Which having a physical place where people can go for help is a barrier for the adoption of open-source software. Just having online resources is not enough, since not everyone has access to them or knows how to make use of them.

Having someone to help you solve problems, or just show you how to do something, in person makes the whole experience better, and easier. Not only that, it generates a level of trust that just reading a document does. Also having how-to videos is helpful, but it is a supplement. Nothing beats having people to help you with your doubts, or teach you what you need.

Not only that, having access to people that help you with whatever you needs helps to build community. That is something that the open-source software movement values, because at the end it is not just about the software itself. It is about creating a community of people to make open-source software better and be what it's users need. Not only developing it, but also giving feedback about what it needs to become better.

From bugs to features, without user feedback development won't go in the direction it needs to go. Seeing how the users actually make use of the software, makes it easier to understands things that just reading a report ever will. There are nuances that can't be related in writing easily, or are overlooked because they aren't considered important to be shared.

More importantly, if we want small and medium businesses, not say corporations, to adopt open-source software we need to get the people who make them up to start and be comfortable using it. If individuals aren't comfortable using it, it will be quite difficult to get businesses to make the jump, not to say imposible. Only after that, software developers that currently focus on proprietary software will even consider to make the jump to open-source development.

This is why I want to start a place where people can come to and have learn in physical place how to make the jump, and learn how to use their apps. Making it so, would also give them the chance to meet other people who use open-source software and see that they are just like them. At the end open-source software should give people the tools they need, without them having to be experts, or know how to code.

At the end, open-source software should be about the people who use it. 

 

Flexibility is the New Currency

Among the things I miss about working from home, is the time flexibility that it gave me. Even working within an office hours, I still had time to do other things before and after hours. If needed, my lunch hour was more than enough time to eat, and do an errand that had to be done when I had to do so.

Going to the bank, buying groceries, or even going out with friends was much easier to manage. All the while, being more productive, since I was better able to focus on work since I didn't have to worry about other errands knowing all could be done in time.

Other thing that I miss, is that focusing was a lot easier. At my home office I had a lot less distractions, and setting to be able to focus on work is a lot easier. Setting my office to my needs is a lot easier, and with less compromises that the on-site office. I can actually select the desk, chair, and stationery that I prefer using.

I don't mind going to the office, but I'd prefer to go just for a few hours a day a couple of days a week. The rest of the time, I'd rather work from home. While my ideal work would be fully remote, a hybrid model would also be nice to have. Mainly because it would allow me to change settings, and prevent me to get bored. Also, meeting with coworkers face to face for a few hours a week would help to team building.

For a hybrid setup, I'd prefer a coworking space rather than a dedicated office. Mainly because that would be a lot more flexible for to meet at an office space, while just paying for the amount of time we use it. Not only that, if being able to access an office space on different locations could be arranged, since some coworking spaces providers have different locations in some cities, and allow their users to access any them as needed. Even some offer office time on other cities where possible.

But, just being able to access an office space when needed for some hours a week is a big win for people like me that would like to have the option. Even being able to meet clients at an place like that is a big win. I do see coworking spaces become more common, since independent professionals, and small businesses, can benefit from not having to invest on renting office space long term if they don't need it.

Even big companies could stand to give some of their employees in cities they don't want to set their own offices, access to coworking spaces near their home to work from.

Personally, I'm looking to make the jump to be able to work from my home office completely, or at least a hybrid model. The advantages are simply to big to ignore.

From Freedom Came Elegance: My Journey to Linux Mint 22.3 Zena

Today I updated to Linux Mint 22.3 Zena, and the new Mint Menu applet is a great update to the aesthetic of the OS. After a few hours of use, the update feels solid and all works like it should.

As with every update, Linux Mint makes honor to the motto from freedom came elegance. It is one of most elegant OS I've used so far. Most importantly for me, it has been getting better with time. It is not perfect, not by a long shoot, but is one of the best OS out there.

It might not be bleeding edge, but is a modern and stable OS that respect the user while being easy to use and set up to the user wants. Most modern hardware works out of the box without problem, and the best thing is that it looks great doing so.

To be honest, I'm going to stick just recommending Linux Mint to new users, and users who want an stable OS who doesn't get in your way, and just works. Bonus points that now playing video games via Steam is something you can do, though some AAA titles don't run well because of the anti cheat systems they implement on the kernel level. Though I've playing Palia and Sword of Convallaria for over four months now without much trouble. I used to play Star Wars: The Old Republic, but I stop playing mainly because of personal reasons.

I used to recommend Ubuntu as well, but Linux Mint has earned to be my main recommendation as well my go to OS. Yet, Linux Mint has become such a solid OS that I feel that there is no reason to have Ubuntu as a second option. If a second option is asked for, I rather recommend Pop_OS! witch is another OS that is easy to use by beginner and advanced users.

I started my Linux journey on Ubuntu, and at the time I didn't imagined that over a decade later I'd moved on and that I recommend other Linux distros over it. Yet, here I am and I am happy to do so.

Charge Me Up, Pour Me a Cold One

As someone who uses a laptop for work, and play, because I like the mobility I'd like to see more options to be able to so outside my home and office. Specially places that offer outlets to connect to when my battery is running low, or just want to game a bit without worrying about the battery. Not to mention, a good and reliable WiFi connection.

While some coffee shops have some outlets, I personally find them lacking, they are too few, and are at tables that are on a dark corner. On this case, I would love to see the number of outlets increased and the number of tables where a couple of laptops could be used at the same time outside the meeting rooms some coffee shops have, since at time those places are just too big when just a couple of people come in just to work, study, or just whatever they need to do.

Personally, I do enjoy having a beer while playing a video game, writing a blog entry, doing some reading, or just browsing the web. Some coffee shops offer beers, but I rather go to a bar since the atmosphere feels a lot more chill and conducive to chill while playing a video game, or doing some light work in a more relaxed place. What would make it better, is to be able to do so while hanging out with a couple of friends.

To be honest, this bar would be the same one I'd come to even without my laptop, and the same could be said of a coffee shop that offer a similar concept. While coffee shops like La Flor de Córdoba come close to what I'd like to see, and on the bar side it would be Santas Alitas, they fall short on the outlets. And for the Santas Alitas side, they also don't offer WiFi or outlets, which is sad, since the atmosphere in the locations I've been to has been one of the best ones.

Other bar that comes close is Skygamers Sports Bar, but it only has on location in Guadalajara and it doesn't really checks all the boxes for me. It lacks the kind of atmosphere that is more conducive to bring your own laptop, and just chill out there either alone or with friends.

Another one that comes close, is Over Wings. While it has WiFi, the problem is that it doesn't have outlets near enough tables. Yet, along with Santas Alitas, it is one of the bars that come closest to be perfect.

What is more, I'd also would like to see a larger selection of draught beer of the beer of Grupo Modelo and Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma along side the other presentations. While some of my favorite beets, like León and Victoria, are from Grupo Modelo, from time to time I do enjoy having an Indio, or a Bohemia, from Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma. Not to mention some of my friends don't want to go to bars where beers from their favorite brand aren't available. Personally, I do prefer having draught beer rather the bottled version of my favorite beers.

I'm sure that there are more people like me out there. People who like the social experience of going out to a bar, even if means sitting alone, to enjoy playing their favorite video game, or just doing some light work, while sipping their favorite beer. The same goes of being able to do so with friends.

Specially in groups of no more of four people, small enough not to take much space or be much trouble, but big enough that the value of their check makes them worthwhile. Personally, I'd put my own if I could to test my idea out.

From Nothing's Design to Pixel's Longevity: My Android Evolution

A few years ago, Nothing used to make the smartphones with design that spoke to me, and made them my top consideration. But, with the design changes they made the last couple of years, using Google Pixel 7a, and the Pixel phones being officially available by Google in Mexico on 2025, the Pixel line has become my personal smartphone line.

Personally, I prefer Android over iOS on my smartphone. And while Nothing OS is quite a good implementation of Android, the smartphones from the Nothing just don't talk to me. I still can recommend them wholeheartedly if you like them, but personally I prefer the Pixel phones, the combination of their hardware and vanilla Android is just better suited for what want and need on a smartphone.

Other thing that makes Pixel a better option for me, is that it offers seven years of Android updates, while Nothing offers five years. The only other Android smartphone OEM the offers something similar I know, is Samsung which I prefer not to get smartphones from.

To be honest, I had an eye on Pixel phones since they hit the market. The only reason I didn't consider them was the difficultly of getting them on Mexico for some time. Then, five years ago I saw that I could get them unofficially, and a couple of years ago I made the jump to a Pixel 7a, which was a great choice.

Now that Google has made the Pixel phones officially available in Mexico, it has made it hard for me to move to another OEM unless Google makes a choice which a disagree with.

All things considered, I Pixel phones might just become my go to smartphone for years to come. Hardware and software works quite nicely, and while the Tensor SoC might not be a powerhouse it ticks all the boxes for my needs.

At the end of the day this is why I prefer the Android ecosystem, there is an Android smartphone that fits your need closely.