Digital privacy...

There is a valid concern about on-line privacy, and how our computers and cell phones might compromise it.

In closed sourced software there is a real danger that back doors, or any type of code used to spy on the user, could pass undetected for long lengths of time without being noticed. All because no one outside the creators of the code can check the code, so there is no chance that other people can notice that the code is there.

This makes it greatly convenient to any organization to use closed software to keep an eye on people, and even try to censor to what we can access.

Open source software is the antidote to keep our privacy, and keep those who would like to take it away at bay. Any information that we share, should be the one that we choose to share and only with those we want to share it with.

We can loose our privacy if we aren't vigilant, and let others control how we manage and share our information. Closed source software is a tool that gives the advantage to them, since they can control tightly how the software works and no one outside those who program it can really check on it.

Do we want to give up our privacy? If you don't, be careful how you manage your information.

ACTA getting shot down...

It seems that ACTA is going under. Which is good news, since the passing of such laws are in detriment of the people.

The good thing that is coming out of this, is that people are getting together to protect the right to have a free and open Internet. But the sad part is that the industry and politicians that propose this laws are not really going to stop trying to get them through.

At the end, it seems that many don't really understand that the way to go now is to truly innovate, or bring new things to the table. The time when anyone could come with a few innovative ideas from time to time are gone, and for good.

And a free and open Internet could be one of the best tools to help to bring innovation. It makes is easier to share ideas and information between individuals and organizations, thus making it easier to come with new ways to do things. Because you have access to a wealth of information, is easier to come to solutions that you hadn't though about yourself.

It also makes it easier to bring people together to collaborate to find solutions, or simply exchange ideas. People have an easier way to find others with similar problems, and collaborate to find the best solutions possible.

Crippling the Internet, means crippling one of the tools that can bring the best chances to truly bring the world together in our quest for a better life. The Internet is forum where we can be equal in ways that cannot be on the real world. It gives all access to a wealth of knowledge that can really help many people to empower themselves with the knowledge and networking that could prove crucial to have a better life.

I do believe that the Internet stop belonging to any particular entity or group, and have come to be of all the people. So, we all should have unrestricted access to it, and use it as it best fit out interests.

Any attempt to censor, or restrict, our activities on should be avoided at all costs. We should be the ones who police the Internet, not small groups or industries.

So, make lets make sure that all know that the Internet belongs to the people now.

Why Mac OS X s third for me...

Today I used a Mac for a while, just for the fun of it. And I must admit that the Mac OS X is third on my favorite OS's, after Ubuntu and Linux Mint.

I do like the looks and usability of the OS, and hardware is really well designed. Yet, I prefer Ubuntu as my day to day OS. Though I must admit I'd like to buy a Mac Pro and install Ubuntu on it, so I could have a really good looking piece of hardware with my favorite OS running on it.

But, what holds me from using an Apple product is the way it wants to control its software and hardware. It feels that Apple wants to take away as much control from the user as it can, so that no one can make the OS like he or she wants to do so.

And that is something that I can't really take. I want to be able to be free to customize my OS as I want to, without any limitations by anyone at all. After all, I own the computer I buy to use.

So, I should be able to customize the software to make it work as I like, or need. Not only that, I should be able to download and/or install any program or application by default. There shouldn't be any need to turn any thing off to be able to do so.

It's sad, because Apple does have a great piece of OS on their hands.

Ripe for new things...

One of the things I like the most about the open source, and free software communities is the level of collaboration that come with them. This makes it easy to find a project that suits what are you looking for, or starting a new one where there is the need.

For me, this makes these communities fields where innovations can come far more rapidly and more ease than when things are done with behind closed doors. Mainly because the information, and how the software works, flows easily. Anyone who has any interest to use, or see how it works can have a look.

And because of these, it's more likely that someone comes with an answer to a problem. Or, can find a new path to solve the problem that hasn't been implemented before.

Closing the doors on this type of collaboration would do more harm than good. It would most likely hinder knowledge than to do any good at all.

Keep vigilant...

This week Foxconn was audited to make sure it meets international standard conditions, after Apple faced some protests because of concerns about the conditions workers that produced its products face.

It was reported that so far, the working conditions are above average. I'm not satisfied since above average might as well that working conditions are bad, but not as bad as in other factories.

My main concern is that it seems that our demands for the consumer goods is driving the kind of conditions for worker that called for the audits. The more things are bought mindlessly, the more companies have to produce to meet that demand. This mindless consumerism is what sets the stage for people out for a profit, try to abuse of workers.

It is to be expected that employers to give good labor conditions to their employees. But, if we all we limit to do is to consume without paying attention under what conditions the goods we buy are produced, we share part of the blame of the any abuse toward the workers.

Yes, is naive to believe that all abuse can be stamped out. There always will be people trying to play the system, and get away with as much as they can. Yet, we can help to make those cases the exception and not the rule.

We need to remain vigilant to how the companies from which we buy goods or services treat their employees. After all, it's with the money they get from us how they remain in business. We can help to better working conditions by buying from those companies that give good working condition. Also by passing the voice around of which one are the ones who treat their employees, so other people can avoid supporting those companies.

We can make the difference, and help construct a better word. All we need, is to remain vigilant and act when there is a need to do so.

Locking in your options...

Even though the Mac OS X is great OS, really good looking and easy to use, I find it disturbing that with the 10.8 Mountain Lion release you can only install Apple signed software from the Apple store by default.

For what I've been reading, there is the option to turn the option of and restore user ability to install software other the one signed by Apple, or from outside their app store. Yet, I believe that this option should be a given and not object to be taking away from the user by Apple or any other company for that matter.

Once I buy any computer with any OS, I expect to be at least be able to install any program that I want or need to work with as I see fit.

After all, we should have the right to put in any software we need to work with on any computer we want to. And if there are limitations to do so, one of them shouldn't be the OS. The OS is only the platform for us to interact with the programs we choose to work with.

We should be able to make software to work on any particular OS we want to, and to share it with who we want to without interference of the vendor who made the OS we might be targeting for. The users should be the ones who decide which programs to run, and from where they get them.

As an Ubuntu user, I've always had the Mac OS X as a second option after Linux Mint. But, if Apple keeps going down this road I won't feel comfortable using their products since they restrict my freedom to use the software and hardware I bought as I want to.

For me, it's a big deal that any one tries to tell what can or can't do with the things I buy. Once I buy them, I expect to be able to use them as I see fit.

To be honest, I would like to see Apple users to make Apple stop building artificial walls around them that limit how they can use the computers and smart phones they bought.

Give credit to the source...

Let's face it, the problem is not that someone takes an idea and make it work in ways that it wasn't originally planned or implemented in a way that the original creator didn't think of.

Doing that, is actually healthy since it drives innovation. No one can thing of every possibility on which an idea, or concept, might be put to work to provide solutions to problems. This is why if there should be any restrictions on ideas, those restrictions shouldn't be upon the use, distribution or modification of the idea.

If an individual, or group, should be punished because they take an idea and they share it. The punishment should come if they fail to give credit to the individual, or group, from which the idea originally came from.

What's wrong, is not that you make use of the idea as you see fit, but that you don't acknowledge when an idea is not yours to begin with.

Even if you are using a modified version of the work, credit is due. So, it's important to have in mind that in some case that mentioning from where you took the idea, and point the way to your source, is all that you have to do.

Yet, sometimes you have to pay to make use of the idea in any way, shape, or form.

It's important to keep this in mind, because the progenitors of any idea have the right to have a say on how you can share their idea. After all, they made an effort to come up with it.

But, it's also unfair for the authors to make to many restrictions and make they idea virtually unusable by people that might have a real need to use it in some way.

So, the main problem is how do we give the author a way to receive both credit, and income, for the idea they put out, and make that idea accessible to the most people as possible.

I don't believe there is a simple solution, or one that will work for everyone.

At the end, we'll have to work together to find one.