Free thinkers...

It's impressive that many people out there don't have a clear background of many subjects not because they aren't smart or intelligent enough, but because their understanding of many basic concepts is lacking or there are several misunderstandings about what is happening.

To make matters worse, people are not willing to take a look on what's going and how things happen. Most are contempt with having a shallow view of what happens around them, and the consequences of events can have on theirs lives. They seem to be happy, or just be contempt, to accept whatever media or other outlets tell them is going to happen.

Consequences are not thought, so when they arrive the surprise that comes with them can be quite a shock. Some even feel offended because no one told them about them, even when just having thought their actions before hand could have prevented any harm.

Not only that, they don't stop to think what they should do. They just do as they are to do at all times, it doesn't seem to matter what they personally think or feel about anything. It seems that many have become a sort of automated machine that can be told what to do, and how to do it.

We need to educate people to think for themselves, and to seek information relevant to their needs before making any decision. Also, they should be able to take the responsibility for those decisions, to accept the consequences and to learn from them. In essence, there is a dire need for free thinkers.

If not, we could end up having a disparate society. Where the top members can manipulate rest of society, just because they don't question why they have to think or act a certain way.Any freedom will be traded to become sheep.

A diverse global village...

The Internet is not just a tool to reach out to the world, but also to attract the world's attention to any particular issue that needs to be taken into account. It can really become a great tool to bring attention to an issue, and to explain why it matters.

There are few tools with more power to bring attention to an issue than the Internet, since it's a platform that allows individuals or small groups the chance to directly contact people that could be of help. There is little need for intermediaries, making the exchange between the ones who need help, and those that could give it, more direct and faster.

With the Internet we have the most powerful tools to create awareness about the issues that truly matter to the communities, and the individuals. There are less middle men than ever before, making contact between interested parties a lot easier with less aggregated interests to them. The messages becomes more clear, and honest, to the message that the originator intended to give.

In many ways, the Internet has the power to make the world closer and to make people more conscious and proud of their roots. Something that seems to be contradictory, but doesn't have to be. Being proud of your community, while feeling connected to the world at large, is something that humanity should strive for.

Each of us belongs to a community, and to the human race at large. By humanizing the members of other communities, we create bridges between us that make humanity truly one. Yet, in order to bring humanity closer there is no need to destroy regional identities.

At the end, diversity is something that communities need to be healthy.

Connected at all times...

It's rather interesting how communication technology has been integrated to our daily lives in such an intricate way. Modern smartphones let us to share with others in many ways, it can be as private as phone call or as public as a Twitter entry.

We can even share photos and videos from our mobile devices from the spot we took them, it's as easy as just selecting the file we want to upload and push a button to do so. There is a few things we can't share yet, not to mention that the smartphone is at all times with us.

Information overload is an ever present possibility, and it's ever more important to be able to filter noise from useful and relevant information. So, there is a need to learn how to effectively filter all the information we get in order not to be overwhelmed, or not be able to differentiate good from bad information.

The hard part is to be able to know which information is relevant to us, so that we can actually do something, and not if the information is available. Now the people who knows how to get that information, and can put it to work more effectively, are the ones who have the edge.

More than ever, we need to give people the tools to effectively balance the capacity to find the right information and the ability to put it to use.

How to do things, almost anything we can imagine, is at hand. I'm hopeful that most will be able to make use of the information we have today, and take humanity to even higher levels.

For a better scientific and technological education...

One of the main areas where education is lagging behind, is on science and technology. Since many people don't really understand the basic scientific concepts, it becomes harder to try to explain concepts that are more complex or how technology works.

This lack of understanding is what generates a lot of the lack of trust in science in general, and why many can't really explain how the technology they use works. In many ways, since many don't really know what to expect from them, the results are never they want them to be.

There is also the fact, that because of this we are losing a lot of brilliant scientist and engineers. Since many children, and teenagers, don't have the motivation to take on studies related to these areas they move on to others that seem to be a lot more interesting.

As a society that depends so much on science and technology, we need to have a higher level of interest and understanding of science to be able to explain the basic concepts. Also how technology comes from science, specially the advanced technology.

Not only that, everyone should be able to join scientific debates or participate on development of technology. Only this way, trust on science and technology can be common place and people would be comfortable around them.

It's important that people don't feel alienated from science and technology, as they are now an integral part of our lives and will continue to be in the future.

Science and technology should be an integral part of education, as the arts and other areas of human knowledge and experience.

Ubuntu's path...

When it comes to the path taken by Canonical selected for Ubuntu, as an user and fan of the OS, I agree and like with it. Yes, there are somethings that I don't like and others than I just love about Ubuntu.

The one thing that I like the most about Ubuntu, is the Unity shell. Personally, I like the way it works and it actually doesn't get in my way. Not only that, most of the bugs and lack of customization have been solved to my satisfaction on the

Precise Pangolin(12.04) version. And for the looks of it, Unity will become even more refined on the upcoming Quantal Quetzal(12.10) version.

In the 2 years I've been using Ubuntu, I've had no major problems. The only crash I had was while testing a beta version, which is not really that much of the issue. Not only that, all the software I need can be used on Ubuntu without much trouble.

I'm not saying that Ubuntu is perfect, it's not the best option for everybody and it may not fit all tasted. I find that I miss being able to easily video chat on MSN, but since I mostly use Skype for it doesn't really matter. I also disliked that for a

Rhythmbox was not included as default for a couple of version, but it was just a matter of downloading it from Ubuntu's software center and install it.

For the looks of it, Canonical is setting Ubuntu to be a great option for beginners and users like me that want to use a Linux distro but don't want to dig on the technical side of it. Not only that, it's a stable and robust OS that has great design.

I plan to stick with Ubuntu on the long haul, since it gives me the best option for my particular computing needs, while being a distro that I'm proud to recommend to new and advance users that want something that works.

Open science and technology...

In order for science and technology become a driving force that improves our lives, we need to start making them more open and facilitate people ability to get more knowledge about what it's been work on in those areas.

Not only that, communities should be allowed to grow around then to work directly on those projects. That work should be allowed to be within the any set of rules made by the initial group that started the project, or independently by other communities.

There should be some level of interaction, and compatibilities, among what worked by the different communities. Yet at what level of interaction should be left to the members of each community to decide. There should be some ground rules on how the can use, and what levels of compatibilities, should be allowed. But, those restrictions shouldn't interfere with the ability to work with the core technology being work with.

Independent efforts, more often than not, are not as effective as efforts made in conjunction with a community working on different aspects of the same problem. That effect can be multiplied if there are several communities working on it from different angles. It allows some communities to hone to a particular aspect that it's more relevant for them, while other work on other areas.

All the while, people would trust science and technology a lot more if they can see what's going on and are given the opportunity to see what's going on. Support could be more easily harnessed, in a variety of ways, if more people can do so by letting them to easily participate in any way they can.

At the end, we can't be interested or support that we don't understand. So, let's open science and technology to all.

Working on a common goal...

One of the attributes that I like about open source, is that it gives anyone the chance to take a piece of software to work with it. By allowing this, it opens up the chance for people to create versions of the software that wouldn't exist otherwise, because the original developer doesn't have the resources or any other reason.

It also benefits users by allowing to make custom versions of the software they, since it maybe that the software doesn't work as well for them as it comes of the shell. Adding or subtracting capabilities could be as easy as adding modules, since in some cases there is no need to change the source code,or the source code could be modified to better comply to what it's needed by the end user. All this could be made in house, or by third parties if there is no way to do it any other way.

Those changes then could be shared back to the main version of the software, or shared with others with the same needs than the one who made those changes. By doing so, more users benefit from those changes, allowing them to have functionality than they couldn't before, and to perfect or add to it if they see a way to improve on it.

It gives users to make the software they work with, and even love, better and to share the improvements with others. Also, if some users don't agree with how the software is managed or where it's been taken, they can take the source code and fork it to take the software on the road they believe it should go.

In many ways, it stops being a black and white view on how software should work. Open source gives users the freedom to take whatever software better suits what they need or want, and work with it as they choose to do so. It allows to exchange ideas among a wider community, speeding the development while making it easier for more voices to be listened and to contribute to the project.

Open sources give a chance to a lot of people to be heard, people that otherwise wouldn't be able to make their voices heard because there isn't a way for them to speak up.What it seems to be a landscape of disparate and dislocated projects, is in reality a thriving collection of communities working on projects that can actually make a difference.

Supporting, and using, open source software is one of the best ways to make our world a better place.

Education and technology are cornerstones to build a better society...

Education and technology are two of the cornerstones that have to be there in order to build a better and fairer society.

Both are interdependent, since in order to advance technology there needs to be educated individuals and to be able to use technology people need to have a certain level of education. One can not exist without the other,  yet both are needed if we want to advance the quality of life for society at large.

There is no need to be afraid of what technology can bring, if people are given the education to use it to the best possible end. People are the ones who make use of technology, and the choices made by the people is what dictates what will come out of the use being given to any technology. This is why it's so important to give proper education, so people make the best use of technology for the individual and society at large.

Technology is there to serve society, since it's a tool to use for the betterment of society. As with all tools, there needs to be a guideline so it can be used effectively. That guideline is the education that is given to make use of the technology.

At the end, investing in education and technology is something that must be a priority. Investing in them is making an investment not only at the present, but also in the long term. Our best bet to have the best possible future, is to make sure that the investment in technology and educations is substantial and maintained at the top.

So, it's on our best interest to make education and technology our priorities in order to advance society. Society needs to make sure is made as fair as possible, and all society has access to them.

An open environment to work on technology...

It's shortsighted to try to pin all worthwhile innovations to a single company in any area of science and technology, when most innovations require the collaboration of whole teams that span more of one company or institute.

There is a need to create the conscience that modern technologies not the work of a single company, and that individuals can be a part of bringing them forward. Not only that, all of the processes that bring any new technology, or innovation, should be open to be revised by third parties to verify that every step was taken to ensure the safety and that it meets the specifications set by the originators.

Technological advancement is a collective endeavor, which requires the work of many people toward a common goal. Not only that, there could be several answers to a single problem that could work depending on the circumstances where those solutions are to be applied.

Regulations need to be placed that allow open collaboration, where all process can be joined by those who are interested in working on a project. Also, there should ways that allow third parties to review the processes that allowed the arrival to a new technology or innovation. There shouldn't be an option to allow anyone to work behind closed door, where there can't be a way to make sure that people won't get what they are offered.

We need technology that runs on open standards, with which any interested party can work without worries about the performance of the standard or if there is a danger of a lawsuit.

A truly open environment, that gives everyone the same tools to work with is beneficial for everyone. It becomes a place where everyone can work toward the their own gaols knowing that their effort will pay of with a product that will work as they intend it to.

At the long run, having an open field for everyone to participate is on the best interest of everyone.

Open source is the path toward keeping our freedoms intact...

The only thing that can make things riskier for the user than closed source, is when the software they depend on for anything they do is control just be one vendor. Being dependent on one vendor means that your data it's tied to the faith of that company, if it ever goes down your data goes down with it.

The argument that a company is to big to fail has been demonstrated to be shaky at best, since in the past decade there have been at least a couple of companies with big names going down. And some others that had dominant positions on their fields are having trouble staying afloat.

This is why we must push to have all important, specially fundamental, technologies to be open sourced so that those technologies can be worked on not only by companies. Individuals should be allowed to work on them freely as well, to make sure that those technologies don't fall in hands on just a few powerful companies, or groups, but they remain free for the benefit of us all.

It's specially important when you realize how integrated technology has become with almost every aspect of our daily lives, we use it without a second though. To give a single company control over any technology is dangerous, since we would be dependent on the continued existence of that company, and we would be forced to never allowing it to go under not matter what.

Our freedoms could be jeopardized, since we wouldn't be able to really make those companies to account for their actions.

Open source gives us as users the power to choose what company we want to buy our technology from, with the real option to go to anther if the company we picked fails to deliver or it goes under for whatever reason.

At the end of the day, open source is not just about innovation. Open source is about protecting our freedoms and interests from third parties.

Open source software should be the core of all tech...

It's hard no to see how many people don't realize that going to closed gardens to find some level of protection isn't that good idea, since being on a closed gardens isn't the same same thing as having software with robust security. The same goes to the idea that a software being open source makes it insecure is false, since that anyone can see the source code doesn't mean that they can put malicious code into it without someone else noticing it and removing the code.

As the matter of fact, open source tends to be safer because there are several people combing the code and knows what's suppose to be there. Those people also know what part of the code is supposed to do, so any part of the code that is new to them can be expected to be reviewed to make sure it does as advertised. It becomes harder to put malicious code into it, because of the nature of source code means that if someone misses the code there will be several other that have a chance to see it.

In the source code software there needs to be the trust that the people that are supposed to keep the code safe do, because they are the only one that can see the source code to make sure that there is no malicious code.

Personally, I don't mind having some closed sourced part in the software I use. But, those closed source parts shouldn't be at the core of the software or be at hearth of it so I can't run my computer properly without them. All closed source should be optional, and the user should be able to turn in off at any time if she or he chooses.

The foundations, and the core, of all the software available should relay on open source technologies. User will be truly free only this way, and there is no way around it.