Another attempt to take control over the Internet away from us...

It's sad to see that now the UN is on the road to try to take control over the Internet. Instead to let the Internet to grow organically, in an open and transparent way in every aspect, it seem that there are special interests groups that want to take Internet behind closed doors.

The Internet belongs to the people, all development that affects its inner workings is to be made on the open. Those working on the Internet, whether on its inner workings or developing its standards, should work on a transparent way so that we all know what they are doing and how their contributions work.

Not a single part of how the Internet works, or how it's developed, should ever be behind closed door. All activity should be on the open, so that any interested party on a certain aspect of the Internet, can have full access to it and the rest of us to know what that party is doing.

Any attempt to take the Internet's control behind closed door, should be opposed by everyone as a question of principle. After all, the Internet is ours. So, we must have a world on how it works and its development.

In many ways, the Internet is an extension of the real world. We live part of our lives on it, as such we must have the same freedoms on it as we have on the real world. So, we should be able to have our freedoms respected as they are on the real world.

In peace, science and technology should move faster...

It's sad to see that technology advances faster on times of war, than it does in times of peace. There is a urgent need to change it so the reverse becomes the norm, so that peace time becomes where science and technology advances faster.

Not only that, we need to have the benefits from new scientific discoveries, and the technologies that develop from them, get to a larger part of society faster.

There must be a way to make peace the norm, by making war at any level undesirable. All conflicts need to be resolved without relying to violence, and people's needs are to be meet as they come.

We need to make it so that conflicts that drive the advancement of science and technology, don't result on violence that ends in bloodshed. Science and technology need to be instruments of peace and understanding, not those of war and violence. If wars and violence are common place, it many ways society at large has failed to do what's needed to keep peace.

Science, and technology, are two of the most important instruments that we have to help keep peace. That's we need to make it so that in peace time it's when their advancement is the greatest and beneficial for society at large.

If we are able to do so, we could be able to turn the world we all want into a reality.

Science and technology bringing the world together...

I would like to see science research and technology development being something that brings the world together.

Instead of being done in secret, by single individuals, corporations, or countries, they should be conducted in collaboration by anyone interested in the subject. Not only that, it should be done in the open in full view of the world.

The education to be able to conduct science research, or technology development, should be given as a priority at any stage of life. Most importantly, people should graduate from basic education with the ability to at least understand the basis science and how it's applied on the technology we use everyday.

Even if end goal of an individual isn't getting a degree on a science or engineering area in college, they should have a functional understanding of science. The same goes the other way around, every part of the human knowledge important.

In the science and technology areas, it's becoming ever more important not only to give the average people a working knowledge in those areas. It's imperative that what happens on those areas is open to the public in every way possible. People should not only know whats going on, but also should be able to participate if there is a desire to do so.

Science and technology are the foundations of the modern societies, and they also be bringing those societies together.

I'm all about Linux and FLOSS...

The more I use Ubuntu, the less likely I'm to switch back to Windows or even make the move to Apple. If I ever change my OS, it would be to another Linux distro that's Debian based as Ubuntu.

I simply have found that Ubuntu works for me far better than Windows ever did, and I don't agree how Apple manages it's software. Also because as a matter of principle, FLOSS strikes a core with what I believe in. Mainly that software should be free in the sense that anyone should be able to see it's source core, modify it, and to redistribute any improvement made to the code.

The freedoms that come with FLOSS gives the users the control over the software they install on their machines. Not only in the way it works and its configuration, but in order to make customizations to the software independently of the source. This makes FLOSS a lot more flexible to the end user, while it benefits the community of users as a whole since those modifications can be shared back.

In the personal level, I feel confident that if Canonical takes Ubuntu on a path that I disagree upon I can change to another Linux distro and have access to the same software I use now. And even if there aren't I can't use a particular one, there will be another that works for me.

In many ways, FLOSS is about people not about the software itself.

Diversity and open standards...

Even though I believe that the diversity on ways to do your work, or have your fun, is one of the strengths of FOSS it means nothing if they aren't built on common ground in order to achieve interoperability.

That interoperability should be made through open standards, so that everyone who want to work with them knows that they can so so without fear of being locked into using software from a single vendor. Closed standards are to be avoided at all costs, since they mean that the future of that standard is tied to the whatever happens to whoever holds it or unilateral choices by the vendor.

Standards should be considered a common good, and as such they should be keep open for to use or contribute to it with freedom. No single entity should have a position to totally control any standard, all standards should be in the hands of a governing body made up by all those who have a stake on the future of those standard.

Not only that, that governing body should work openly and with transparency. Anyone that has an interest on how that body work, or how it reach a decision should be able to do so.

At the end, standards are the foundations on which all technology are built upon. As such, is in our best interest for them open so we all know that there will be always be available for everyone. Not only that, any improvement made to any standard will be beneficial to as many users as possible in the least amount of time.

The building blocks of out society, and our future, should belong to all of us.

Looking at the Android options...

I've been doing some checking around for a new smartphone, and I'm convinced that it'll be an Android device. There are a several options out there at my price range, from several manufactures.

Not only that, for me it's important my next smartphone to run Android, since it's open source software. In a sense it's a matter of buying a smartphone that runs software that is compatible with what I believe, and the only Android manage to do so.

The fact that I can choose from a wide range of manufactures, and several models they offer, calls me even more. It means that I can choose the experience I get from Android, looking for the smartphone thats form and design is what I'm looking for. I'm not tied to a single manufacturer, giving me whatever they think I want.

Android gives me the level of freedom I want, letting me choose the handset that better suits my needs and what I like. All this while being a modern a robust mobile operating system, the only things that change from one manufacturer to another are the form factor of the handsets, the user interface and the software it comes with. The core is the same you get is the same.

At the end, Android is the mobile OS for me. So, now is just a matter of choosing the smartphone I'll buy.

Portability and connectivity...

It's interesting to see how technology seems to be consolidating several devices into one, which means that as a whole people will need fewer devices to do more.

The idea that with a couple of devices you could replace most of the ones you have now. Not only that, those devices will be portable enough to be taken with you everywhere. And with modern connectivity technology you'll be on line most of the time, with all the implications it brings along.

Today we are connected to the Internet almost 24/7, and almost from anywhere, thanks to laptops and smartphones. In many ways, both laptops and smartphones are points of access that grant humanity to share all what they want in an instant.

So much so, that nowadays the question is no longer if we could share our daily routine with our friends and family. The real question has become what should be sharing, and how much privacy we want for ourselves.

This is why is so important have a complete control on our information. With so much of our personal information out there, it's most important to be able to have a granular control over it in order not to loose control over it.

It's both a blessing and a curse, but we have to learn to live with it.