Ease of use...

Some Linux distros have been adding great improvements on the ease of use, specially by users that aren't as knowledgeable on the technical side of running a computer.

That's what I like the most of Ubuntu and Linux Mint. Both of these distros are really easy to use, and you don't need to be an expert to use it or to set it up. Most importantly, they come out of the box with the software the average user use and any additional software can be easily added if needed later on.

I've found both to be a lot easier to use, and set to my liking, than Windows. My personal favorite is Ubuntu, since the Unity is a better fit to my computer needs and I like its look and feel.

Ever since I started using Ubuntu, with the 10.04 version, my laptop computer has to be able to run it without any problem at all.

But, now the argument that Linux is difficult to use or that is to technical to use is no longer a valid point. I've found by personal experience that there are distros that are really easy to use, and that allow you to get comfortable using Linux and learning how the technical side works if you choose to do so.

If you choose not to do so, you can still benefit from a stable and reliable operating system. With the added value that is easy to use, and it works.

Open source benefits...

Using open source software comes with several benefits, most of them are unknown by users either because they don't do proper research or don't have access to the information needed.

One of the benefits is that bugs tend to be found and corrected a lot faster than on closed sourced software, because you have many people working on the source code. Having a lot of eyeballs browsing the source code for trouble, means that bugs are found while before the stable release or soon thereafter.

This also makes a software a lot safer, since many different people can find vulnerabilities that could be exploited to gain access to the system. Or any code putted in place that could threaten the end user's interests, mainly because no central power has complete control over all system and people have a sense of ownership of the software they contribute to or use.

It's a lot harder to hide code on the source code, and any unwanted code can be removed with greater ease. And if there is any disagreement on what road should the project should go, forking the project is a real possibility.

Another benefit is, that you don't depend on a single source to provide with the software you need or with any changes you might want to be made to the software in question. There are several communities out there that can, and are willing, to help you out with whatever you might need. Most often than not, the answer to your needs, or problems, is a quick search away.

The odds that you'll find a forum, or a support group, that can help you find the answers you need are really good. For most problems, you can find the answer in a matter of minutes.

Open source is truly a community that is helpful, and where you can find something that suits your needs.

Countdown for Ubuntu 12.04....

As an Ubuntu user, and fan, April and October are special because with them a new version of my favorite distro arrives.

So, I looking forward to April 26th when Ubuntu 12.04 is set to be released. The changes so far look promising, and being a LTS version most of what has been implemented in the 11.04 and 11.10 versions has matured or is a lot more polished.

I upgrade to the new version of Ubuntu each time it's released since it means that it comes with the most resent Linux kernel version, and it has most of the recent versions of the software I use. So, is a good idea to upgrade to the next version since it come with all the advantages of Linux kernel that can make use of newer technologies more efficiently, or comes with code that it's updated and/or patched so it's safer to use and plays nicer with newer hardware.

And, I've found Ubuntu to be a joy to use. I fell in love with the Unity shell, it really speaks to me and it doesn't get in my way. As a matter of fact, the Unity shell help making Ubuntu my favorite distro by far.

It might not be for everyone, yet I've found Unity that meets all my needs and most of my likes. And the fact that almost all the issues I would have with its current state addressed on 12.04, it makes me glad to be a user of Ubuntu.

It's a great time to come to Linux...

Microsoft just announced that in two years time the plug will be pulled of Windows XP, one of the best OS I've used.

With the close release date of Windows 8, it seemed that the best road would be waiting a few months to make the jump from XP. But, after reading various reviews of the upcoming OS and knowing the Windows track record of past Microsoft's OS releases, it seems that if you want to upgrade to a modern OS you are better off jumping to a Linux distro.

There are several Linux distros that are easy to use, and that come with all you need to work with on the daily basis. My personal favorites are Ubuntu and Linux Mint, but there are several distros out there that could be a better fit to your personal needs and what you expect of a modern OS.

All of them with a community behind it, that is willing and able to help you with any question or problem that you could face along the way. Yet, most of the time you shouldn't have any problem at all. Most the the hip cups that come along, and let's face it all OS's have some, are easily solved by just a simple search or by asking around.

Not only that, the odds is that you won't have to make a big investment on new hardware in order to make the jump. Your current computer is most likely supported by several distros, and if you decide to buy a new computer it doesn't need to be an expensive one. That's one of the nice things of Linux, it plays nice with low end hardware because it isn't a resource hog.

There is a lot of choices for a Linux distro that fills all your expectations on how your computer should work.

Strength and weakness...

One trend that I've seeing when somethings changes to a distro, or when comparing two distros, is that reviews tend to focus too much on the relative strengths or weaknesses of whats on the software.

Bringing attention to the particular strengths and weaknesses in the software isn't bad in itself. What can be prejudicial to the community is how they are treated. Strengths should be pointed out so people that are interested know what are the benefits of that particular distro, app or software. The weaknesses should be pointed out so users know before hand to help them avoid using a something that wont serve their needs, and the coders now where they need to work to improve their software.

Let's face it, all software will have strengths and weakness depending of what are their aims and the particular abilities of the people who creating them. And something that some perceive as a weakness, could be view as one by the people who made the software.

All depends for the purpose for what the software was made for, and the direction the people who made it have for it. You don't have to agree with them, and the creators don't have to please everybody.

Is important that people who come to use Linux have in mind that not all distros are not created equal. Each distro has its particular strengths and weaknesses depending to what objectives they are targeted for. Keep in mind what are your needs, and look for the distro that best suit them.

Often, you'll fine that there are few distros that meet them. That's one of the mayor strengths of the Linux community, that there you can choose the distro that meets your needs, and that you can love to use.

Knowledge should flow freely...

All technology that is used to exchange and distribution of ideas and information between people, should be free for all to access. More importantly when that technology is core for learning.

Knowledge is vital to help people to make choices correctly, as such everyone is entitled to have access to the best possible information possible. This is specially important in areas like education and health, where not having the relevant knowledge at hand could have lethal consequences or leave the the individual at an unfair disadvantage.

That individuals don't have access to relevant information in most areas, doesn't just have a negative impact on the individual. It also has negative impacts on the communities as a whole, since the lack of information can prevent them to make decisions on a timely manner and leave the community exposed to unnecessary ricks.

Yes, mistakes and misunderstanding will happen. Those are facts of life, yet are no reason to prevent people to be able to have access to the best and most complete informations they need in any given situation. Most importantly, knowing empowers us to take the best course of action for ourselves as individuals, and for our families and communities.

This is why we need that all informations we need to create knowledge to be made public on open standards, that can be implemented by as many people as possible. If not, we rick loosing much knowledge just because we no longer have the ability to open it because lost the key for it. This a very real possibility if the key is held by a single vendor, and it doesn't share it.

The user should be able to use whatever software he chooses to put his information in, and to share it with whom ever he wants without being restricted to use a particular platform to do so. The use of a particular platform should be dictated by the user needs, and how he chooses to work, not by the vendor choosing to implement a closed standard.

FOSS licenses...

Contrary to what many people would like to have people believe, FOSS licenses don't hinder software development and innovation.

As the matter of fact, software under FOSS licenses can spur innovation not only in software. It can help to bring innovations faster to all areas of human knowledge by allowing to change and study the software used to better suit what is used.

Not only that, collaboration would be easier. It would allow people to improve or change the software to suit their needs, and to be free to distribute the modified software to other people. This would benefit everybody, since both the people who released the software and users can have access to the modified code to make use of it.

People on the same field could have to the latest software either at a fraction of today's cost, or for free. This means that relevant information, and software, could be more evenly distributed allowing all interested parties can work on a level field. Developments made this way would be a lot more easier to make, and the final user would have access to them faster.

With more people being able to work with the latest set of information make innovation easier to come by. Mainly because the odds of someone coming to a new way to use, or to work with, something are more likely with more people working on the subject. And, if those people can collaborate with each other in a more practical and efficient way, those innovations would come at a lower cost and more people could have access to them.

We need licenses that facilitate collaboration, not licenses that hinder it. Those licenses should allow people to change and redistribute those changes in a easy and practical way, while protecting the right of the authors.

All interested parties should be able to do any changes as they see suit, and to be able to contribute those changes back to the community. Emphasis should be to make it easier on facilitating the work of thinkers and innovators to work and give back.

Knowledge should be open to all who wants it.